| |
| Coordination | ULB |
| Partners | UIA,KBR |
| Start date | Month 1 |
| End date | Month 9 |
| Prerequisites | None |
| Objective | Preparation of the involvement of the six libraries (associate partners) into the VirLibII system. |
| Tasks of this WP | 1.1. Choice and contact with the six new libraries. 1.2. Technical guidelines. 1.2.1. Definition of the technical requirements to install the VirLib system. 1.2.2. Technical instructions to install the VirLib system. 1.3.1. ILL service guidelines. 1.3.2. Definition of the ILL service requirements to run VirLibII. 1.3.3. ILL service manuel to run VIRLIBII. |
| Result | Technical instructions and ILL service instructions |
| Deliverable | Technical instructions manual to install VirLibII system (French and Dutch) and ILL service manuel to run VirLibII (French and Dutch). |
| |
| Coordination | UIA |
| Partners | ULB,KBR,KUL,UCL,UG,ULg,NDP,VUB |
| Start date | Month 10 |
| End date | Month 12 |
| Prerequisites | Completion of ProVirLib WP1 and VirLibII WP4 |
| Objective | Installation of the VirLib system in 6 libraries. |
| Tasks of this WP | 2.1. Installation of the PDF server software. 2.2. Training of the ILL staff. |
| Deliverable | Report on installation. |
| |
| Coordination | ULB |
| Partners | UIA,KBR,KUL,UCL,UG,ULg,NDP,VUB |
| Start date | Month 13 |
| End date | Month 22 |
| Prerequisites | Completion of WP |
| Objective | The target of the system evaluation is to assess the quality of the service, its effectiveness and its friendliness by new partners. |
| Tasks of this WP | 3.1. Definition of evaluation criteria and specification regarding: 3.1.1. The technical aspects of the services. 3.1.2. The functionalities of the services. 3.1.3. The PIB librarians. 3.1.4. The end users. 3.2. Implement evaluation test scripts. 3.3. Complete evaluation sheets. 3.4. Record statistical information. 3.5. Analyse the results of evaluation. |
| Result | Evaluation and recommendations for WP4 |
| Deliverable | Evaluation Report |
| |
| Coordination | KBR |
| Partners | ULB,UIA,BVD/ABD,VVBAD,CIUF,VOWB |
| Start date | 1 september 1998 |
| End date | 31 augustus 2000 |
| Objective | The purpose is to reach the end users as well as the information providers. The actions will focus
more on awareness raising than on training, because the technology used in VirLib will make the use
of the system self-evident and ease of use has been taken into account during the design of the system. The sensitizing actions will be adapted to the various target groups: This means used include : demonstrations, seminars, workshops and courses, brochures, leaflets tutorials and other printed materials; electronic presentations; exhibition displays. Contents of brochures and other publications, infodesks, seminars, etc. The following items will be dealt with :
Brochures and other publications. The use of the system cannot be fully explained unless it is illustrated with concrete examples (screenprints). Exposition desks. The quality of the delivered documents can be illustrated with outprints. Electronic presentations. Consist of a simulation of the order process on one pc + printer. Demonstrations. Demonstrations should preferably show the complete process starting from searching a document through the WWW-access to catalogues up to reading or printing the requested document on the workstation of the enduser. Locating the title of a periodical and ordering and receiving an article can be demonstrated to end users. Demonstrations will preferably make use of materials belonging to the institution where they take place. The administrative handling of a request and the scanning-process can be demonstrated to a public of information professionals (demonstrations should take place in one of the VirLib libraries). |
| |
| Coordination | KBR |
| Partners | ULB,UIA |
| Start date | Month 1 |
| End date | Month 24 |
| Objective | 2.1. Coordinator Daily management of the project.
3. Decision-making proces. Whenever possible, the decisions of the Management Committee are taken unanimously. Otherwise, a majority vs. minority vote is required. In case of a tie, the coordinator's vote shall be decisive. The coordinator invites the partners to the meetings and sends them, at least one week before the day of the meeting, the agenda as well as the required enclosures. The coordinator draws up the reports of the meetings. The agenda, the required enclosures and the reports are sent to the OSTC for information. 4. Validation of reports The reports contain the names of the authors (institutions, possibly individuals). The coordinator numbers the reports in accordance with a preestablished shedule. The reports have to be validated by the management committee, unanimously or by means of a majority vs. minority vote. In case of a tie, the coordinator's vote shall be decisive. The reports are public. 5. Meetings There are two types of meetings:
As much as possible by email or fax. 7. Dissemination of information
|